Case of Neverov and Others in Saransk

Case History

In February 2023, a series of searches took place in the homes of Jehovah's Witnesses in Saransk. A month earlier, the Ministry of Internal Affairs opened a case on organizing the activities of an extremist organization. Several believers, including women, were taken for interrogation to the center for combating extremism. Some of them said that the investigators tried to force them to incriminate themselves and their friends. Mikhail Shevchuk, Ivan Neverov and Artem Velichko were placed in a pre-trial detention center for 2.5 months, and later under house arrest, where they spent more than 3 months. In August 2023, their preventive measure was changed to a ban on certain actions. Later, the case of Artem Velichko was separated into a separate proceeding. In January 2025, the case against Neverov and Shevchuk went to court.

  • #
  • #

    The Supreme Court of the Republic of Mordovia, as a result of an appeal against the chosen measure of restraint, releases Mikhail Shevchuk, Ivan Neverov and Artem Velichko from the pre-trial detention center under house arrest. The believers spent more than 2.5 months behind bars.

  • #

    The court changes the measure of restraint for believers from house arrest to a ban on certain actions.

  • #

    The criminal case against Artem Velichko is separated into a separate proceeding.

  • #

    The case of Ivan Neverov and Mikhail Shevchuk is submitted to the Proletarsky District Court of Saransk. It will be considered by judge Inna Balyasina.

  • #

    About 30 people are present at the first hearing. The defendants say they do not consider themselves guilty. Ivan Neverov notes that the essence of the accusation boils down to participation in worship services via video link. He emphasizes: "The prosecutor did not take into account the fundamentals of Christianity, to which Jehovah's Witnesses belong. From the very beginning of their existence, Christians have kept in touch with each other and held joint worship services with common prayers and the singing of spiritual songs." Mikhail Shevchuk agrees with Neverov's arguments and adds that he professes his faith following the example of Jesus Christ.

    Both believers note that the accusation does not contain any indications of extremism in their actions. Similar statements are made during the interrogation of witnesses. For example, Murlaev, an employee of the Center for Counteracting Extremism, talks about the infiltration of two informants into a group of believers and notes that during the years of operational-search activities, he has not heard any extremist calls from the defendants.

    Another witness, a 78-year-old man, retracts his testimony to the investigator and states that he did not say what is recorded in it.

  • #

    Interrogation of the secret witness Semyonova. The defense files a motion to declassify it.

    The defense lawyer, addressing the court, says: "This is not the first time I have participated in this kind of cases and I draw attention to the fact that this is really the most harmless confession that exists. Nevertheless, the defendants are being charged under the most serious article."

    The court denies the motion.

  • #

    The defendants again petition for the declassification of the identity of witness Semyonova, because the witness herself during interrogation in court confirmed that there were no threats, violence or other actions against her that would cause reasonable fears about security. Moreover, interrogation in such a mode, according to Neverov, deprives the defendants of the opportunity to ask questions that help to identify false testimony on the part of the witness. The court does not accept these arguments and refuses to satisfy the petition.

    Two witnesses for the prosecution are being questioned via videoconferencing. Among them is Sergey Vlasov, who had previously participated in another trial of believers in Saransk. Then his identity was also initially classified, but later the court declassified Vlasov.

  • #

    Interrogation of the secret witness Andreev. The defense and the defendants file a motion to declassify it and ask for interrogation in the courtroom. According to Ivan Neverov, this is necessary, since during the trial it was obvious that the secret witnesses had repeatedly testified according to the instructions received.

Back to top